Kriegs- und Nachkriegsfolgen
15.07.2003 / 16:44 | Aktualizováno: 15.12.2017 / 14:32
Dekrete des Präsidenten Edvard Beneš
The Decrees of the President Edvard Beneš Text auf Englisch plus Dokumente auf Deutsch und Englisch Česká verze textu - www.mzv.cz/dekrety
|
|
1. The Decrees in General |
Photo Courtesy Victor Adler: President Beneš Reviewing Czechoslovak Troops Arrived from Egypt to England, 1943 The Decrees of the President of the Republic are norms that were issued in London during Czechoslovakia´s occupation by Nazi Germany and on Czechoslovak territory immediately after the termination of that occupation, prior to the meeting of the Interim National Assembly and the renewal of a parliamentary order (from July 21, 1940 to October 28, 1945). The President was authorized to issue the Decrees following a hearing in the State Council (a body comprised of officials in exile of all Czechoslovak political orientations) and upon the Government´s proposal. These Decrees were required to be additionally ratified by the Parliament (this was done on March 28, 1946). The Decrees governed numerous aspects (among them the topical question concerning the activities of the Resistance in Exile, the waging of the war alongside the Allies against Germany, the state budget, and the country´s post-war reconstruction). Needless to say, during the period of emergency legislative and executive powers in countries under military occupation, those countries´ governments in exile proceeded in a similar fashion (including the Netherlands). Unsubstantiated statements and generalizations with respect to the Presidential Decrees may provoke emotional reactions. The Decrees as a whole constitute an expression of the continuity of democratic Czechoslovakia´s legal status, even during the country´s occupation itself, and a counterbalance to the measures adopted by Nazi Germany´s administrative offices. Persistently, the London-based governmental bodies were targets of the hateful attacks by the Nazi occupation forces. The occupation propaganda spoke in the same breath of "a new Europe" and "a new European order" as being alternatives to the Allies´ plans for the future arrangement on the European continent. One need hardly point out what types of associations attacks on the Decrees, together with the resistance to Nazism and the continuity of the Czech legal regime might unconsciously evoke (owing perhaps to one´s unfamiliarity with the overall context). a) Transfer of the population No Czechoslovak (Czech) legal norm (decree, law, etc.) ever existed that would have dealt with the displacement of the German population and opinions among Allies concerning this issue varied. Of special importance for the future development was in this respect particularly the view of the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. The above provision cannot be separated from the overall context of the punitive approach adopted by the Allied Forces against Germany and the Germans, which was expressed, for example, in the form of the end-of-the-war bombardments, the Morgenthau plan for the deindustrialization of Germany, the Potsdam Conference, and the Paris War Damages Agreement ("Agreement on Reparation from Germany... ", Paris 1946). This punitive approach, shared also by the Western Allies, lasted until the early 1950s. It was based on the preceding events, especially the Nazis´ genocidal plans and acts. During the war, the Czechs, too, were victims of expulsion, physical liquidation and forced assimilation, since the Nazis had elaborated plans according to which the Czechs as a nation would become extinct within a thirty-year period, "still during the Führer´s lifetime". To a certain extent, the Czech politicians of that period identified themselves with and supported the post-war punitive measures, including the transfer. Today, with the lapse of time, these measures might well be reassessed and rediscussed; however, the Czech party can hardly repeal non-existent legal norms. All it can do is to voice its political opinion with respect to the events of those days. On the bilateral level, this was done by way of the Czech-German Declaration on Mutual Relations and Their Future Development, adopted in 1997. The Czech side has expressed regret about the wrongs and suffering caused to many innocent people in the context of the post- war removal and forced transfer of Sudeten Germans, expropriation and deprivation of citizenship, especially with regard to the application of the principle of collective guilt. The Czech-German Declaration was welcomed by many states, including the Austrian government, as a positive step towards common European understanding. In this connection, the reverse side of this problem should be mentioned: the overwhelming majority of the Czech victims of Nazism or their descendants were never indemnified (only a small group has received payments from the jointly financed Czech-German Fund for the Future). Moreover, the laws stipulating that the sentences pronounced against the Czech Resistance fighters during the war had been lawful were valid in Germany until 1997 (without the European Parliament ever, or in any form whatsoever, expressing an opinion on this matter). Furthermore, the Czech party received no payments of any sort for pre-war Germany´s debts to it (in accordance with the London Debt Agreement). The German indemnification and restitution laws concerning the victims of Nazism are clearly discriminatory, as they explicitly excluded victims from Central and Eastern Europe for no good reason. For example, the Communist regime was frequently cited as the factor barring the transfer of compensation payments, although from 1960 on, payments were made with no problem at all to former members of the Wehrmacht who lived in those same countries. The question of extensive financial transfers of Czech funds to the Reich and indemnifications for individual losses and sufferings has to date been resolved only in part. Nevertheless, in the interest of common European understanding, the Czech government is not approaching these issues in the spirit of confrontation. For example, together with the governments of Poland, Israel, Russian Federation, Ukraine and Belarus it has negotiated compensations for former slave and forced labourers, to be paid in the near future by the Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and the Future". b) Decrees Concerning Confiscations of So-called Enemy Property and Citizenship It may be assumed that the critics of the Decrees - owing to the fact that no transfer decree exists - are referring particularly to the measures regarding property and citizenship. Several such decrees were issued. The initial measure was stipulated in Decree No. 2/1945 of February 1, 1945, and particularly in Decree No. 5/1945 of June 3, 1945, determining that "any form of property transfer and transaction affecting property rights in terms of movable and immovable assets, and public and private property shall be invalidated, if it was adopted after September 29, 1938, under pressure of the Nazi occupation or national, racial or political persecution" (i.e. this Decree repealed the Nazi confiscation measures adopted against the victims of Nazism). At the same time, however, the property owned by persons deemed unreliable in terms of state interests was placed under a national administration. In Czechoslovakia, this measure affected German nationals and persons who had collaborated with them ("persons who were involved in activities oriented against the state´s sovereignty, independence, integrity, its democratic and republican form, security or the defence of the Czechoslovak Republic; persons who incited such activities, who attempted to make other persons undertake such activities and who intentionally supported, in any form whatsoever, the German and Hungarian invaders"). German property, the owners of which "had been the victims of political or racial persecution and who had remained loyal to the State´s democratic and republican ideas", was to be exempted from national administration and returned to its owners. This decree was followed by a number of other measures, especially Decree No. 108/1945 of October 25, 1945 "on the confiscation of enemy property". In compliance with its Paragraph 1, German property, the owner of which had suffered Nazi or fascist terror, was exempted from such confiscation. In accordance with Czechoslovak law, expropriation without indemnification was facilitated by the Constitutional Charter adopted in 1920. In terms of its international validity, it was endorsed, for example, by the Paris Conference held in 1945 and in various other agreements. The question of citizenship was treated in Decree No. 33/1945 of August 2, 1945. On the basis of this decree, the Czechoslovak State released from its citizenship those persons who, "in compliance with the regulations of the foreign occupation forces had acquired German or Hungarian citizenship". Czechoslovak citizenship was maintained in the cases of those Germans who, at the time of the increasing threat to the Czechoslovak Republic, had officially supported the Czechs, or those who had manifested "their loyalty to the Czechoslovak Republic, had never committed any offence against the Czech and Slovak nations, and who had either actively participated in the struggle for the liberation of the country, or had suffered under Nazi or fascist terror". The legal norms adopted at a later date largely reconfirmed or strengthened the exceptions allowing exemption from the confiscation and citizenship measures (on the basis of these norms, Czechoslovak citizenship was maintained in the case of larger groups of persons). Today, these decrees and laws have lost their original significance. According to the Czech Constitutional Court´s ruling of March 8, 1995, Decree No. 108/45 was a singular act which "for more than four decades has established no legal relations and thus no longer has a constitutive character"; it is thus naturally no longer applicable in the future. On February 17, 1999, within the framework of its Foreign Policy Concept, the government of the Czech Republic deemed these legal norms "extinct"; this formulation was also adopted, on June 9, 1999, by the Czech Republic´s Chamber of Deputies. Conclusion The decrees dating from 1940-45 are historical acts, which for their most part lack any significance today. They reflect the continuity of Czechoslovakia´s legal status during the period of its struggle against Nazism and form a part of a complex of wartime and post-war events and approaches. On the bilateral, Czech-German level, this question was resolved by way of the Czech-German Declaration adopted in 1997 (text in English, Czech, German), in which both parties agreed that they would not burden their relations with legal and political problems of the past. The so-called punitive approach to Germany does not constitute a specific Czech problem, but is rather a matter to be considered in a broader context, which thus far has not been discussed on the international level. It is questionable to what extent the reopening of these matters (furthermore, at a time when the legal and material wounds suffered by the victims of the Nazi aggression have not yet fully healed) would contribute to peace and understanding in Europe. At present, a discussion of those decrees lacks any legal significance or meaning; it can be nothing more than a historical debate.
News Pressemitteilung der Bundesregierung vom 25.8.2005 zu der Erklärung der Tschechischen Regierung, die sich bei jenen aktiven Gegnern des Nationalsozialismus, die - darunter auch tschechoslowakische Staatsbürger deutscher Volkszugehörigkeit - nach 1945 von Zwangsmaßnahmen des tschechoslowakischen Staates betroffen waren, entschuldigt hat.. Erklärung der Tschechischen Regierung vom 24.8.2005 Erklärung des MP Gross und Bundeskanzler Schröder. 19.11.2004 Die Erklärung der Bundesregierung zu Vermögensfragen vom 5.8. 2004 Die Erklärung des Bundeskanzlers Gerhard Schröder zu Vermögensfragen, Warschau 1.8. 2004 Erklärung des Außenministeriums der Tschechischen Republik zu vermögensrechtlichen Fragen der Nachkriegsaussiedler (03.08.2004) Stellungnahme des Präsidenten der Tschechischen Republik, Václav Klaus, zu dem Gesetz über Edvard Beneš MFA Statement on the Resolution of the European Parliament on Enlargement Negotiations Resolution of the European Parliament on the State of Enlargement Negotiations - Draft Text which has remained unchanged in its paragraphs on the Czech Republic. Passed 13/06/2002. French MFA Spokesman on the Beneš Decrees Resolution of the Parliament of the Czech Republic, Chamber of Deputies, Concerning the Presidential Decrees President of the Czech Republic Václav Havel: "Edvard Beneš: Dilemmas of a European Politician" Joint Press Statement of Prime Minister Zeman and EU Commissioner Verheugen Documentation for the European Parliament Ambassador Sečka´s Letter to the EP Foreign Commitee Chairman MFA Reaction to the Declarations of EP Deputy and SLD Chairman Bernd Posselt Minister Jan Kavan on the Statement of European Commissioner Günther Verheugen Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Telička on the Statement of EC Member Verheugen Jan Kavan: "Decrees Were Also Used by Today EU Members" Osteuropa Institut Bremen - Juli 2002 European Parliament Resolution of the European Parliament on the State of Enlargement Negotiations - Draft Text which has remained unchanged in its paragraphs on the Czech Republic. Passed 13/06/2002. Legal Opinion on the Presidential Decrees and the Accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union - October 2002. ( in Czech, German and French) European Parliament Resolution on the progress made by each of the candidate countries towards accession - November 20, 2002 European Commission The Czechoslovak Presidential Decrees in the Light of the Acquis Communautaire Verheugen, Commissioner Responsible for the Enlargment Joint Press Statement of Prime Minister Zeman and EU Commissioner Verheugen Positions FRANCE GERMANY GREAT BRITAIN SWEDEN SLOVAKIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Exchange of Verbal Notes between the Czech Republic and the United States of America regarding issues of property arising out of the Second World War from 12th July 2000 Potsdam Conference The Potsdam Conference - full text of the Protocol of the Proceedings Documents Decrees of the President of the Republic from the years 1940-1945 - information document The Czech-German Commission of Historians The Czech German Declaration Adopted in 1997 on the Pages of the German Ministry of Foreign Affaires EU Documents on the Czech-German Declaration Paris War Damages Agreement London Debt Agreement Munich Agreement - text in English Speech of the Reich Protector Reinhard Heydrich on the Elimination of the Czech Nation Edvard Beneš: Curriculum Vitae/ Lebenslauf (auf Deutsch) /auf Tschechisch) |
|